Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] first known map of hnnisv tridominium & its trilines & tripoint
Date: Oct 25, 2006 @ 17:24
Author: Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <lgm@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
----- Original Message -----
From: "aletheia kallos" <aletheiak@...>
To: <boundarypoint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:14 AM
Subject: [BoundaryPoint] first known map of hnnisv tridominium & its
trilines & tripoint
> interesting new sketch map of the gulf of fonseca
> http://www.laprensa.com.sv/nacion/Las%20aguas%20en%20condominio.pdf
> found in this fresh report of a disputed island within
> it
> http://luterano.blogspot.com/2006/10/el-salvador-and-honduras-argue-over.html
> gives a first clear impression of the de jure hnnisv
> triarea
> the most multisovereign territory in the world
> & its borders & multipoint
>
> on this map
> the tridominial territory is bounded by the thick blue
> gulf closing arrow to its southwest & by the gold &
> blue dotted territorial sea limit lines of ni & sv
> respectively to the east & north
>
> so these dotted lines are the tridominial trilines
> hnnisvni & hnnisvsv respectively
> as far as their first intersection point
> at the tridominial tripoint hnnisvnisv
>
> notably only ni & sv abut this tridominial area
>
> for hn this tridominium is an exclave or overseas
> territory
>
> nor does it appear to contain any islands to fight
> over
>
> the legal text for it
> from a 1992 icj decision
> is as follows
>
> THE CHAMBER,
>
> 1. By four votes to one,
>
> Decides that the legal situation of the waters of the
> Gulf of Fonseca is as follows: the Gulf of Fonseca is
> an historic bay the waters whereof, having previously
> to 1821 been under the single control of Spain, and
> from 1821 to 1839 of the Federal Republic of Central
> America, were thereafter succeeded to and held in
> sovereignty by the Republic of El Salvador, the
> Republic of Honduras, and the Republic of Nicaragua,
> jointly, and continue to be so held, as defined in the
> present Judgment, but excluding a belt, as at present
> established, extending 3 miles (1 marine league) from
> the littoral of each of the three States, such belt
> being under the exclusive sovereignty of the coastal
> State, and subject to the delimitation between
> Honduras and Nicaragua effected in June 1900, and to
> the existing rights of innocent passage through the
> 3-mile belt and the waters held in sovereignty
> jointly; the waters at the central portion of the
> closing line of the Gulf, that is to say, between a
> point on that line 3 miles (1 marine league) from
> Punta Amapala and a point on that line 3 miles (1
> marine league) from Punta Cosigüina, are subject to
> the joint entitlement of all three States of the Gulf
> unless and until a delimitation of the relevant
> maritime area be effected; that the legal situation of
> the waters of the Gulf of Fonseca is as follows: the
> Gulf of Fonseca is an historic bay the waters whereof,
> having previously to 1821 been under the single
> control of Spain, and from 1821 to 1839 of the Federal
> Republic of Central America, were thereafter succeeded
> to and held in sovereignty by the Republic of El
> Salvador, the Republic of Honduras, and the Republic
> of Nicaragua, jointly, and continue to be so held, as
> defined in the present Judgment, but excluding a belt,
> as at present established, extending 3 miles (1 marine
> league) from the littoral of each of the three States,
> such belt being under the exclusive sovereignty of the
> coastal State, and subject to the delimitation between
> Honduras and Nicaragua effected in June 1900, and to
> the existing rights of innocent passage through the
> 3-mile belt and the waters held in sovereignty
> jointly; the waters at the central portion of the
> closing line of the Gulf, that is to say, between a
> point on that line 3 miles (1 marine league) from
> Punta Amapala and a point on that line 3 miles (1
> marine league) from Punta Cosigüina, are subject to
> the joint entitlement of all three States of the Gulf
> unless and until a delimitation of the relevant
> maritime area be effected;
>
> etc
>
> & yet
> from this it is not clear
> or at least not to me
> whether there might not also be a second triarea
> within the gulf
> several miles eastward from the clearly established
> one
> & shown on the above map surrounding the mileage scale
> & north arrow
> & bounded by gold & blue & red dotted lines
> & thus adjacent to all 3 countries
>
> but can anyone say if there is only the single
> tridominial area or 2
>
> here is a map of the full gulf for your consideration
> http://encarta.msn.com/map_701512830/Gulf_of_Fonseca.html
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>