Subject: Re: another gysr gusher
Date: Apr 04, 2001 @ 09:04
Author: peter.smaardijk@and.com (peter.smaardijk@...)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., michael donner <m@d...> wrote:
> the guyana suriname boundary dispute has been under discussion in
english
> for some months now
> at http://www.surinamenet.com/ubb/Forum2/HTML/000023.html etc
> by local informants from both sides of the courentyne
> & other likeable characters from around the world
>
> the several accumulated pages of it may fill in the blanks somewhat
for
> anyone who couldnt follow the previous instalment of this in dutch
> & they run a pretty fair gamut from the slapstick to the ridiculous
> with a few really good laughs thrown in
> if you can stick with it long enough
>
> the allegedly trilateral 1936 brazil guyana suriname tripoint
> howsoever much disputed by suriname
> is said at one point here to be occupied by a cement object
> our first substantive word of the marker
> if it can be believed that is
>
> however i have yet to find a mention anywhere of any mark at the
surinamese
> version of the tripoint position
>
>
> insights into underlying & prevailing realities
>
> also a few good links to interesting maps etc
>
> m