Once again for AFIRPK my tp pushpin is way off.

There is no other explanation that GE did some ajustments.

Good we get theese corrected.

Thanks for the help.

Jesper

Borderbase - your online guide to international borders and tripoints

http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase

Fra: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com] På vegne af aletheia kallos
Sendt: 8. september 2006 15:48
Til: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
Emne: [BoundaryPoint] afcnpk test was a success so continuing with afcntj & afirpk etc

this especially nice afcnpk result at the gmane
archive
http://article. gmane.org/ gmane.culture. discuss.boundary -point/9194
has the image & explanation all on a single easy page

so
the present attachments similarly revisit afcntj &
afirpk
in order to fill these back in also with a
corresponding level of detail
before continuing forward at this level with the rest
of the world tour

please look again in each case for the little
measurement line extending from the erroneous google
overlay tripoint position to the little red square
marking the corrected tripoint position

following are the explanations for these again
first afcntj & then afirpk
just so everything will again be collected in one easy
place

> > all 3

treaties mentioning this tripoint

> > namely afcn & afsu &

cnsu

> > actually delineate their convergent borders along
> the

ridge lines & water divides

> > which tho not necessarily always

the same thing

> everywhere
> > do meet perfectly on the soviet

topos

> > at their common trijunction point nearest

the
summit

> of povalo shveikovski
>

http://mapy. mk.cvut.cz/ data/Centr. _Asia/Topo% 20maps_500k/ J-43-V.jpg

>
> for this reason i would place the pushpin at the

snowy

> ridge

junction

> east southeastward of the tripoint position shown in
>

the google border line overlay

> as indicated there at roughly
> n

lat 37d14m02s & e long 74d63m23s

>
> & i would consider

that correct only to within about

> 100 meters
> owing to the

limitations of the photography &
geocoord

> registry etc
>

albeit the best known try to date

> per the treaties & soviet

topos this tripoint is

> evidently on the highest summit of the kuh i

malik

> siah massif
>

http://mapy. mk.cvut.cz/ data/Centr. _Asia/Topo% 20maps_500k/ H-41-V.jpg

>

tho it isnt absolutely clear which of the several

> roughly equally high

points this actually refers to

>
> my fairly confident guess tho is

that the google

> borders are showing this situation almost

exactly

> right
> for a change
> even tho the tripoint

depiction does clearly fall a

> bit below the peak & in fact some 50

meters east of

> the likeliest summit point
> which my mouse makes

out to be at about

> n lat 29d51m41s & w long 60d52m41s
>
> & this is offered with the usual caveat of up to 100
> meters

of possible error

> but only if i do indeed have the right summit
>

for otherwise this guess could still be much farther astray

____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail. yahoo.com