Subject: RE: [BoundaryPoint] czplsk practically found
Date: Jul 11, 2006 @ 19:52
Author: Hugh Wallis ("Hugh Wallis" <hugh@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


The stream confluence is approximately equidistant from the CZ and PL obelisks. You can't really tell that from any of the photos but you can if you go there in person.


From: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of aletheia kallos
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 3:43 PM
To: boundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [BoundaryPoint] czplsk practically found

if you would look again at this pic of the cz & pl
obelisks
http://freepages. misc.rootsweb. com/~hughwallis/ CZPLSK/DSCN2103. jpg
& realize that the official measurements place the
tripoint not much farther down the hill than the 2
obelisks are distant from each other
or roughly 27 meters as against 16
then you can practically
s e e
the legal tripoint position within frame
or not very far out of view beneath the curvature of
the hill

nor would this position even seem to lie among the
thicker veggies yet

perhaps it is not at all far beyond the last of the
signs & poles

other views of the area just below the obelisks
confirm this overall impression of an open clearing
covering most if not all these 27 meters
http://www.vasa. abo.fi/users/ rpalmber/ CzPlSk2.jpg
http://www.vasa. abo.fi/users/ rpalmber/ CzPlSk1.jpg
http://freepages. misc.rootsweb. com/~hughwallis/ CZPLSK/DSCN2099. jpg

now correct me if i am wrong but my sense at least of
the stream confluence is that it lies in deep woods a
good deal farther down the hill than any of these
scenes even extend

& unless i am mistaken about that
then it certainly appears now
even without having to wait for winter or any retry
that either the stream confluence tripoint positioning
or the official measurements of the tripoint
positioning must be wrong

i can scarcely wait for the next try based on these
data tho

or else for these measurements to somehow get busted
in favor of the confluence position
for i agree it still seems a reasonable enough
hypothesis
had it not been for these pesky data that seem to rule
it out

but please do amplify the impression or correct any
wrong impression in any of this if you can

like how far would anyone guess the confluence
actually is from the pair of obelisks

etc

____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail. yahoo.com