Subject: still an honorary or free caus pass on the main drag to mbmnon<br/>
Date: May 03, 2006 @ 14:22<br/>
Author: aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos &lt;aletheiak@...&gt;)<br/>
Prev&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next<br/>
<a href="19490.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="19492.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-172962413"><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/anderson.cooper.360/blog/2006/05/border-checkpoint-relies-on-honor.html">http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/anderson.cooper.360/blog/2006/05/border-checkpoint-relies-on-honor.html</a><br/>
<br/>
cursory location of post<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://topozone.com/map.asp?">http://topozone.com/map.asp?</a><br/>
z=15&n=5461446&e=343569&s=500&size=l&datum=nad83&layer=DRG250<br/>
<br/>
state of the tripoint try itself<br/>
so far as i know<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.bjbsoftware.com/corners/pointdetail.php3?point=149">http://www.bjbsoftware.com/corners/pointdetail.php3?point=149</a><br/>
<br/>
but note bus&ss mentions the 2 reference marks shown<br/>
in the above topo for indirect demarcation of this<br/>
turning point<br/>
as being in n lat 49d23m04s49 <br/>
& as shown perhaps more clearly here albeit without<br/>
those markers<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://topozone.com/map.asp?z=15&n=5472185&e=343739&s=50&size=l&u=2&layer=DRG25">http://topozone.com/map.asp?z=15&n=5472185&e=343739&s=50&size=l&u=2&layer=DRG25</a><br/>
<br/>
this lat is curiously distinct from the official ibs<br/>
latitude given here <br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.internationalboundarycommission.org/coordinates/LLakeWo.txt">http://www.internationalboundarycommission.org/coordinates/LLakeWo.txt</a><br/>
which is in fact 35 hundredths of a second or say 35<br/>
feet farther south<br/>
as well as about 15 feet east the longitude suggested<br/>
by bus&ss<br/>
<br/>
not that these differences would necessarily have been<br/>
perceptible with a commercial gps receiver or 2 <br/>
<br/>
& the true location of the tripoint is most probably<br/>
the position stated by the ibs as turnpoint 1 anyway<br/>
<br/>
so there is no quibble to be made here<br/>
but just a slightly open question & perhaps some short<br/>
distance still left to go<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
__________________________________________________<br/>
Do You Yahoo!?<br/>
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam<br/>
protection around <br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://mail.yahoo.com">http://mail.yahoo.com</a> <br/>
<br/>
__________________________________________________<br/>
Do You Yahoo!?<br/>
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://mail.yahoo.com">http://mail.yahoo.com</a></div>