Subject: Secretive Cooch behar quads<br/>
Date: Jan 24, 2006 @ 06:40<br/>
Author: Brendan Whyte (&quot;Brendan Whyte&quot; &lt;bwhyte@...&gt;)<br/>
Prev&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="19241.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic19240.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="19239.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="19241.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1679132712"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt; <br/>
&gt; but when you say the jalpaiguri report<br/>
&gt; was still secret<br/>
&gt; do you mean to indicate you believe it no longer is<br/>
&gt; secret<br/>
&gt; & thus that your presumption might now be confirmed<br/>
&gt; somehow<br/>
&gt; one way or the other<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>I would think the 1930s report is still &#39;secret&#39;, as it was when i tried to view it in <br/>
2000. The wheels of openness grind slowly in the subcontinent, if at all...<br/>
But i haven&#39;t been back to ask.</div>