Subject: SV: VS: [BoundaryPoint] Russian/Soviet demarcation at tripoint
Date: Jan 17, 2006 @ 20:58
Author: Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
I think I will just stick to Borderpoint instead,.
Jesper
Fra:
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com ] På vegne af aletheiak
Sendt: 17. januar 2006 20:45
Til: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
Emne: Re: VS: [BoundaryPoint]
Russian/Soviet demarcation at tripoint
jesper i realize you may well
have a very loose view of what a tripoint is
& also perhaps of what the meaning of at is
but even so
let me add
just to relate the message to the title somewhat
we do already know both of the mdua tripoints are
in the middle of the prut
so you must mean to suggest that a marker like the
fundamental colorful sort shown there
rather than the commonplace white sort also shown
will be found on the left bank of the prut quite
near to if not in actual sight of the tripoint
at both mdrouas & mdrouan
for that would both make sense & replace the
lost one here
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/14527
also i can confirm you were quite right to report
no mention of the tripoints in your
previous post too
--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com ,
" Jesper Nielsen "
<jesniel@i...> wrote:
>
>
>
> MDUA evidence thanks to unknown contributor
to Borderbase:
>
> http://www.ingeocad.md/?link=2
<http://www.ingeocad.md/?link=2&limb=en>
> &limb=en
>
>
>
> Jesper