MDUA evidence thanks to unknown contributor to Borderbase:
http://www.ingeocad.md/?link=2&limb=en
Jesper
Fra:
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com ] På vegne af
Jesper Nielsen
Sendt: 15. januar 2006 19:45
Til: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
Emne: [BoundaryPoint]
Russian/Soviet demarcation at tripoint
The Soviet Union seems to get things their way at border demarcation:
NORU:
http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=118&c2=107
FIRU:
http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=118&c2=49
LTPL:
http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=86&c2=114
BYPL:
http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=11&c2=114
PLUA:
http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=144&c2=114
SKUA:
http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=144&c2=124
HUUA:
http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=144&c2=65
ROUA probably:
http://www.macalik.cz/fotky/rum/hranice.JPG
MDUA: no known evidence
GETR: no known evidence
AMTR: no known evidence
AZTR: no known evidence
AZIR: no known evidence
AMIR: no known evidence
TMIR: no known evidence
AFTM: no known evidence
AFUZ: could this be a marker? Otherwise no known evidence
AFTJ: no known evidence
CNTJ: no known evidence
CNKG: no known evidence
CNKZ: no known evidence
CNRU:
http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=30&c2=118
MNRU:
http://www.bluepeak.net/mongolia/tavanbogd.html
PKRU: no dry border
But when if comes to dry tripoints, we don’t have RU/SU get their way, but
we have
FINORU:
http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/tripoint.php?c1=118&c2=49&c3=107&orientation=
which is Scandinavian style
PLSKUA:
http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/tripoint.php?c1=144&c2=114&c3=124&orientation=
which is sort of western European style
CNMNRUE:
http://www.canonfans.com/digest/6/27514120221.htm
which is Chinese style
Jesper
--
Borderbase - your online guide to international borders and tripoints
http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase