just walked up to the hilltop here
& realized there so had to come running back down to correct or add here
with all due credit & honor to all of you & us
there is no discredit or dishonor in missing nor even in not trying for the target
& the target is itself indishonorable & indiscreditable too
--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, aletheia kallos <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
>
> yes indeed barry you are quite right of course
>
>
> & yet at the same time let me take this opportunity to
> say
> & not at all pointedly to you yourself but in general
> the present series of excursions here at boundarypoint
> is still missing the point of boundarypoint
> which is
> in a nutshell
> seeking finding researching etc geopolitical m u l t
> i p o i n t s
>
> or
> in somewhat less of a nutshell but still quite clearly
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/
>
> for it is around this specific & especial interest &
> quest that our discussions here revolve
> or rather were intended to revolve
>
> & indeed these discussions
> even at their best & most focussed
> sometimes do & must necessarily range very broadly
> no doubt about it
> just like it says in the our introductory blurb
>
> & they may even seem quite miscellaneous &
> unprincipled & undisciplined
> until one grasps the subtlety & nicety of what they
> are in fact all about
> which is to serve & support & cultivate our stated
> focal purpose
> of multipointing
>
> for it would make no sense at all to set up a target &
> then deliberately go about missing it
>
> & because we have found that the more one misses the
> point
> the more one continues to miss it
> & ultimately doesnt even notice it at all
> we have taken the care of deliberately creating
> another bp place too
> where all tangential & centrigugal interests & goals
> such as this one are entirely welcome & indeed
> solicited
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/borderpoint/
> so there really shouldnt be any confusion at this
> point
>
> but if anyone still isnt clear or sure
> let me put it differently
>
> boundarypoint is not about general education &
> information
> isnt that lovely
> but rather about a specifically focussed pursuit
> toward a unique & clearly stated target
>
> & pursuing general education & information here
> as much fun & value as that may well involve
> not only misses but discredits & dishonors this target
>
> shots on goal are what we are about here
>
> & for all other interests we have even made sure that
> you
> our dear & valued members
> have other options too
>
> --- Barry Arnold <barry_432@h...> wrote:
>
> > I would have thought land fill that extended the
> > natural coastline of a
> > country would have the effect of extending the
> > territorial limit.
> >
> > >From: Seÿffffe1n O'Connell <gleannmaghair@y...>
> > >Reply-To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> > >To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> > >Subject: RE : Re: [BoundaryPoint] Oil rig or
> > lighthouse in int'l waters
> > >Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:33:09 -0500 (EST)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >'Artificial islands, installations and structures
> > do
> > >
> > >not possess the status of islands. They have no
> > >
> > >territorial sea of their own, and their presence
> > does
> > >
> > >not affect the delimitation of the territorial sea,
> > >
> > >the exclusive economic zone or the continental
> > shelf
> > >
> > >(United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,
> > >
> > >article 60.8).
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--- "Lowell G. McManus" <lgm@w...> a
> > écrit :
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >---------------------------------
> > >
> > >Eric asked:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Or for that matter, could a country extend its
> > >
> > >waters by using landfill to
> > >
> > > > make strategic peninsulas?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Yes, it could. Landfill, jetties, piers,
> > artificial
> > >
> > >islands, etc. all generate
> > >
> > >territorial seas.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Lowell G. McManus
> > >
> > >Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>