Subject: the apparent way to eglysd
Date: Jan 09, 2006 @ 19:09
Author: aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next
Prev Post in Time Next
>(however elusive) of the
> Your proposal for using whatever is the datum
> demarcated segments of EGLY for undemarcated LYSDand EGLYSD seems entirely
> reasonable and justified if they are indeed alldelimited in the same treaty.
>apparently dies yet could revive
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "aletheia kallos" <aletheiak@y...>
> To: <boundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 9:46 PM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] eglysd datum spec try
> by technicalitycollection
>
>
> > no sooner than i dove back into the treaty
> > at turtle bay did i realize the game was up on theproposed
> > eglysd datum identifcation try as previously
> > by lowellthe
> >
> > for it was only then it finally dawned on me that
> > lysd agreement i would be looking for there wasthe
> > very same 1934 eggbit i had just found & readthere an
> > hour beforedatum
> > hahaha
> > & so i already knew full well it contained no
> > spec or demarcation provision for lysdeven
> > &
> > since there are no other known lysd agreements or
> > negotiationssame
> > it follows that the dozen funky rocks that the
> > mystified ibs number 10 says lysd
> > a p p e a r s
> > to be demarcated by could easily fall into the
> > strange mirage category as the 22x27 egsd sign &its
> > perhaps 50 or more companions that likewise appearto
> > demarcate egsdbe
> >
> > & so with 2 of the 3 convergents now appearing to
> > at best only apparently demarcatedthe
> > hahaha
> > even if we got lucky finding the paperwork with
> > datum spec for the third convergentsudan in
> > namely the very well demarcated & thus presumably
> > datumized egly dating from the late 1920s
> > & could extrapolate our way to eglysd from it
> > we would still have no known participation by
> > this datumduring
> >
> >
> > so that was basically a complete show stopper
> > qed & rip
> > for a brief moment anyway
> > until i was then also reminded that sudan was
> > that period an anglo egyptian condoagreement
> > aha & phew
> > so the 1934 eggbit or now eglysd tripoint
> > does very much appear to complete the elusiveof
> > requirement of trilaterality all by itself
> > perhaps without our ever needing to find the datum
> > a second convergent demarcationof
> >
> > now let me hastily insert i am not absolutely sure
> > this inference & of course would like to hear whatyou
> > think of it as well as anything else in all thisegly
> > before proceeding
> >
> > but if the above reasoning is indeed valid then it
> > means we might proceed to the eglysd datum on the
> > strength of the egly datum alone in this uniquely
> > special circumstance
> > or rather
> > that the eglysd datum is hereby confirmed as the
> > datum even sight unseenunited
> >
> > & that all we need to do then is to find the egly
> > datum
> >
> >
> > but anyway upon that surmise or realization i
> > immediately & excitedly plowed back into the
> > nations agreement index in order to try to do justapparent
> > this
> > until i was stopped dead cold again by the
> > absence from it of any of the several italoegyptian
> > agreements that occasioned these egly demarcationsleaves
> > hahahahaha
> >
> >
> > so at this point i dont really know where that
> > us if not in hopeless complexity & obscurityresearch
> > i mean above & beyond the apparent extreme
> > challenge still before usresult
> > nor even if it will make any difference in our
> > if anyone can figure out how to find any of thelikely
> > very pertinent 1925 & 1926 & 1938 egly or ratheregit
> > agreements mentioned herehttp://www.law.fsu.edu/library/collection/LimitsinSeas/IBS061.pdf
> >
> >__________________________________________
> >
> > any bright ideas while we are still waiting for
> > mohamed
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________
> > Yahoo! DSL - Something to write home about.
> > Just $16.99/mo. or less.
> > dsl.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>