Subject: eglysd datum spec try apparently dies yet could revive by technicality
Date: Jan 09, 2006 @ 03:46
Author: aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


no sooner than i dove back into the treaty collection
at turtle bay did i realize the game was up on the
eglysd datum identifcation try as previously proposed
by lowell

for it was only then it finally dawned on me that the
lysd agreement i would be looking for there was the
very same 1934 eggbit i had just found & read there an
hour before
hahaha
& so i already knew full well it contained no datum
spec or demarcation provision for lysd
&
since there are no other known lysd agreements or even
negotiations
it follows that the dozen funky rocks that the
mystified ibs number 10 says lysd
a p p e a r s
to be demarcated by could easily fall into the same
strange mirage category as the 22x27 egsd sign & its
perhaps 50 or more companions that likewise appear to
demarcate egsd

& so with 2 of the 3 convergents now appearing to be
at best only apparently demarcated
hahaha
even if we got lucky finding the paperwork with the
datum spec for the third convergent
namely the very well demarcated & thus presumably
datumized egly dating from the late 1920s
& could extrapolate our way to eglysd from it
we would still have no known participation by sudan in
this datum


so that was basically a complete show stopper
qed & rip
for a brief moment anyway
until i was then also reminded that sudan was during
that period an anglo egyptian condo
aha & phew
so the 1934 eggbit or now eglysd tripoint agreement
does very much appear to complete the elusive
requirement of trilaterality all by itself
perhaps without our ever needing to find the datum of
a second convergent demarcation

now let me hastily insert i am not absolutely sure of
this inference & of course would like to hear what you
think of it as well as anything else in all this
before proceeding

but if the above reasoning is indeed valid then it
means we might proceed to the eglysd datum on the
strength of the egly datum alone in this uniquely
special circumstance
or rather
that the eglysd datum is hereby confirmed as the egly
datum even sight unseen

& that all we need to do then is to find the egly
datum


but anyway upon that surmise or realization i
immediately & excitedly plowed back into the united
nations agreement index in order to try to do just
this
until i was stopped dead cold again by the apparent
absence from it of any of the several italo egyptian
agreements that occasioned these egly demarcations
hahahahaha


so at this point i dont really know where that leaves
us if not in hopeless complexity & obscurity
i mean above & beyond the apparent extreme research
challenge still before us
nor even if it will make any difference in our result
if anyone can figure out how to find any of the likely
very pertinent 1925 & 1926 & 1938 egly or rather egit
agreements mentioned here
http://www.law.fsu.edu/library/collection/LimitsinSeas/IBS061.pdf


any bright ideas while we are still waiting for
mohamed













__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com