Brendan, is that term intentionally "wikan"? (Maybe meaning "Wiccan"?) How about "wicked"? I need to know the correct fantasy I should be employing here.

Bill

----- Original Message -----

From: Brendan Whyte

To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 8:51 PM

Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Thames - source and ... boundary marker!

There was a good TV programme on the Thames recentlyhere, a British documentary, following the river from its source to the sea. The chap went to the 'source' and found no water, just a dry hole, but a mile or so away found some wikan women putting flowers into a pond at a spring which is the top of the river if you follow the water upstream. B >From: Peter Smaardijk <peter.smaardijk@...> >Reply-To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com >To: "BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com" <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com> >Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Thames - source and ... boundary marker! >Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 15:26:46 +0100 > >Following the Thames downstream, you will find an actual boundary marker! >So what is the boundary >then? > >It is, apparently, the boundary between the tidal and non-tidal river. But >it is a very nice >obelisk. > >http://dhart.future.easyspace.com/thames.htm > >Peter S. > _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.