Subject: Re: SMh
Date: Nov 01, 2005 @ 14:06
Author: aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
>
> I appreciate your thoughts well. But since all we do is nonsense anyway, it
> does not matter how non-sensical we are in our hobbies.
>
> Greetings to all multipointers who wish to make a point,
> Wolfgang
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com]Im Auftrag von aletheiak
> Gesendet: Montag, 31. Oktober 2005 23:02
> An: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> Betreff: [BoundaryPoint] Re: SMh
>
>
> may i say i find your itsm2chermhe call far more credible than this smh
> claim or try
> for of course castles do grow on mountains
> just as lightning rods or tv dishes etc grow from castles
> & all that is well only natural
>
> so to disallow such manmade objects as these in determining the extremities
> of manmade
> objects such as countries is completely inconsistent & makes no sense at all
> to my thinking at least
>
> & for you to then require yourself to figure out
> exactly
> where nature ends & human nature begins
> hahaha
> well that would be pure masochism if it werent already a punctological
> impossibility
> as i think you must have realized there already
> & as i also recently saw at the base of a similar tower that had been built
> upon us2mah
>
>
> but was there some indication that this castle marked an internal multipoint
> of san marino
>
>
> more likely one castello for each municipality there i would think
>
>
> such cute places as san marino tho do present great opportunities for
> cardinal news tours
> & extremity star tours etc
> which synthesize multipointing of a sort
> or recombine it in a way
> by artificially assembling all the extremities of a given place into one
> place
> & thus in the present example multiplying smh by smn & sme & smw & sms &
> perhaps
> even sml & smm too
> all in a single 5 or 6 or 7pointed star presentation
>
> & such combinative multipointing as that would be the only multipointing
> possible
> if places didnt also meet naturally
> at individual multipoints
> luckily for us
>
> but at all events there you have 2 different descriptions of pursuits that
> might answer to
> the same name of multipointing
>
> original or natural multipointing as it were & synthetic or manmade
> multipointing
>
>
> but at all events it seems to me
> in collecting extremities just as in addressing single multipoints
> even the slightest degree of moderation or compromise or exceptionalism
> would belie the
> earnestness & authenticity of the try
>
> so i think for example you were much closer to smh in the moments when you
> were the
> highest man in san marino than in the moments when you were at the foot of
> the tower
> for you were still attached to & really a part of physical san marino at
> both of those points
>
> & if you were jumping or flying over the highest point of san marino
> you would still be in san marino too
> but above rather than at or upon its highest point
>
> & i realize such a recognition of the obvious may make it especially hard on
> hapless
> highpointers
> who might then have to go climb trees or crucifixes or whatever object they
> find rises
> highest from any given place
> but happily it keeps all claimants equally honest
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@i...> wrote:
> >
> > This is my interpretation of SMh.
> >
> >
> >
> > But hard to determine on this place were this castle seems to grow on the
> > mountain.
> >
> >
> >
> > I was also inside the tower of
> > http://i1.trekearth.com/photos/9179/san_marino.jpg, which made me the
> > highest man in SM for a few minutes.
> >
> >
> >
> > Such a cute little country.
> >
> >
> >
> > Jesper
> >
> > --
> >
> > Borderbase - your online guide to international borders and tripoints
> >
> > http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>