Subject: Re: SV: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Monkey gets BEDELU wrong
Date: Jun 28, 2005 @ 19:16
Author: aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


--- Jesper Nielsen <jesniel@...> wrote:

> Monkey could be partially right, but do we actually
> know if the condo
> markers are direct or indirect. I am not sure if we
> ever cleared that
> answer.

aha good point

& after having looked at it again every which way
i have come to believe that the condo territory
actually expands & contracts with the rising & falling
river levels
& that all the riverside delu markers are thus
generally indirect
except when the river level happens to coincide with
them exactly

but i also continue to believe that all your data & my
analysis in message 14832 are otherwise still
essentially correct too
but for my belated realization that the belu & bede
convergents actually do follow the stream centers
rather than the thalwegs
as you have rightly maintained

& the net result of all this is that i now believe no
part of marker 52 is ever in belgium nor ever on belu
but rather that it is entirely in luxembourg when all
dry
as in the pic
& entirely in the delu condo when all wet
& smack on delulu only when half wet & half dry

so now that i have seen all that light
hahaha
i believe you are absolutely right that monkey is
always absolutely wrong

Maybe our many German friends are able to
> dig out some data here
> once and for all.
>
>
>
> Jesper
>
>
>
> _____
>
> Fra: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com] På
> vegne af aletheiak
> Sendt: 28. juni 2005 19:01
> Til: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> Emne: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Monkey gets BEDELU wrong
>
>
>
> hahahahahaha
>
> hahahahahahaha
>
> ahhhh
>
> talk about following suit
>
> hahahaha
>
> etc all night & morning
>
> a perfect monkey see monkey do
>
> & clearly our best joke try ever
> class a
>
>
> but isnt marker 52 itself at the luxembourg end of
> the bedelulu triline
> & so not really wrong but rather just barely
> partially right
>
>
> i think the no mans zone must be bogus as usual tho
> dont you
>
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper
> Nielsen" <jesniel@i...> wrote:
> > http://www.monkeytravel.org/eu.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > But any other data on the unclaimed land?
> >
> >
> >
> > Jesper



__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail Mobile
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail