My guess would be that any no-man's land is bogus. Perhaps the story told by the monkey is inspired by a "cession" of land by the three nations to the EU or one of its predecessor organizations as a site for the little park with the flag poles, etc. I rather suspect that this "cession" was of land ownership, not sovereignty. In that way, it would be analogous to the American military cemeteries in Europe and elsewhere, the Napoleon house in St. Helena, etc.

Lowell G. McManus
Leesville, Louisiana, USA

----- Original Message -----

From: Jesper Nielsen

To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 12:49 PM

Subject: SV: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Monkey gets BEDELU wrong

I would place my money on bogus, but Monkey has a story to back up his claim.

Monkey could be partially right, but do we actually know if the condo markers are direct or indirect. I am not sure if we ever cleared that answer. Maybe our many German friends are able to dig out some data here once and for all.

Jesper

Fra: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com [mailto: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com ] På vegne af aletheiak
Sendt: 28. juni 2005 19:01
Til: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
Emne: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Monkey gets BEDELU wrong

hahahahahaha

hahahahahahaha

ahhhh

talk about following suit

hahahaha

etc all night & morning

a perfect monkey see monkey do

& clearly our best joke try ever
class a

but isnt marker 52 itself at the luxembourg end of the bedelulu triline
& so not really wrong but rather just barely partially right

i think the no mans zone must be bogus as usual tho
dont you

--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com , " Jesper Nielsen " <jesniel@i...> wrote:
> http://www.monkeytravel.org/eu.html
>
>
>
>
>
> But any other data on the unclaimed land?
>
>
>
> Jesper