hahaha
hahaha
as you feared
as you feared
indeed
because you feared
the one who fears something the most is the one who has it most activated in their
vibration
& so
it is logical that they would experience it
still
thank goodness our beloved peneclavity does indeed appear to remain so nearly
embedded here
for that is the point
isnt it
& my own curiosity only multiplies
thanx to your valiant translation
for indeed how can we find out now if these numbered points really are marked yet
or just still supposedly approximate turning points for an eventual primary demarcation
for it appears thus far that eelvru at least is already very much defined by actual markers
in addition to text
but again we have seen neither the text nor pix of the numbered markers so far in that
case either
tho at least they were reported to have been seen
if i am not mistaken
etc etc
or in other words much clarification is still wanted there too
--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Brendan Whyte <bwhyte@u...> wrote:
> As I feared, Babelfish had confused the translation by duplicating partial
> sentences and not translating other partial sentences. A careful effort has
> resulted in the following three paragraphs concerning the pene-enclave.
> These confirm the same boundary as currently shown on Estonian 1:20,000 map
> titled 'Rosna', sheet number 55.31, dated 1997.
> This map indicates individually number boundary pillars, or at least
> turning points, which are not described in the treaty. The treaty is fairly
> vague is its descriptions as to distance, direction etc [it is not a
> surveyors description, but indicates general alignment, which the surveyors
> will then follow, and allows them a little leeway in the placement of
> pillars or the making of exact delimitations].
> The treaty description does, however, confirm that the pene-enclave will
> survive, with the same boundary, or at least one effectively the same, as
> shown on current Estonian and Russian maps.
> Note that Dubki translates into English as 'oaklings', that is, young oak
> trees. The Estonian name is Tupka.
> The 'nameless island' is named on the Estonian map as Plaava.
> The 'nameless stream' is named on the Estonian map as 'Reetska'.
>
> Boundary of pene enclave as per recent Russo-Estonian boundary treaty
> (edited Babelfish translation from the Russian)
>
>
> "Then boundary goes 5.8 km on the middle of Kuleyskaya River in the general
> northwestern direction, leaving a nameless island on the Russian side,
> intersects the bridge across the river on its middle [bridge from Podmotsa
> in Estonia to Kulje in Russia - editor] and, going around the outline of
> the peninsula in Lake Pikhkva (Pskov) a distance of 250m from the Estonian
> shore, it leaves the lake for the point on the shore of lake, located in
> 0.8 km to northwest of the Estonian village of Podmotsa and 0.8 km to the
> northeast of the Russian village Dubki [=oaklings!!].
>
> From the point indicated the boundary goes 0.3 km southwards along the
> swamp, then 0.5 km upstream of a nameless stream in a south-south-eastern
> direction, leaving the village of Podmotsa on the Estonian side, and
> village of Dubki on the Russian side, and then a further 0.6 km in the
> western-south-western direction on the swamp with the insignificant
> fracture [??] to the south to the rural road between the Estonian village
> of Kremessova and the Russian village of Dubki.
>
> From the rural road the boundary goes 0.5 km southwards along the swamp
> and the meadow, then 0.5 km eastwards, and a further 0.4 km in
> south-south-west and 0.9 km in northwest directions along the swamp and
> ploughed land to the coast of Lake Pikhkva (Pskov), intersecting the rural
> road between Kremessova and Dubki and leaving the farmsteads of the village
> of Kremessova on the Estonian side."
>
>
> Brendan Whyte