Subject: Re: Largest enclave<br/>
Date: Mar 14, 2001 @ 09:37<br/>
Author: peter.smaardijk@and.com (peter.smaardijk@...)<br/>
<a href="1741.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="1749.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic1638.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="1742.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="1744.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1742550691">--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;Brendan Whyte&quot; &lt;brwhyte@h...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; Enclaves have in international law a right to access across<br/>
 </span></blockquote>intervening <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; land. But presumably not fragments like Nakhichevan, tho i am not<br/>
 </span></blockquote>sure on <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; this.<br/>
&gt;<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Is this standing international jurisdiction? If it is, I can think of<br/>
countries that couldn&#39;t care less. I think of the major problems for<br/>
the inhabitants of the Bangladeshi enclaves, and those in the Fergana<br/>
valley.<br/>
<br/>
Peter S.</div>