Subject: Re: CNINNP fixed?<br/>
Date: Apr 15, 2005 @ 21:35<br/>
Author: aletheiak (&quot;aletheiak&quot; &lt;aletheiak@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="17377.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic17377.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="17377.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="17379.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1922036287">presumably you mean cninnpe rather than cninnpw<br/>
so the answer is yes & no<br/>
for it is evidently fixed only insofar as cnnp is concerned <br/>
& is still unmarked even bilaterally by china & nepal<br/>
nor have we ever seen any hard data for the innp & cnin convergents<br/>
or in other words <br/>
for the former nepal sikkim & the former china sikkim borders<br/>
tho they are indicated clearly & plausibly enough by your map<br/>
apart from its conspicuous omission of the name of jongsang peak<br/>
the nominal tripoint location<br/>
 <br/>
& to the extent that it has been fixed at that location<br/>
this was effectively done when china first recognized sikkim as part of india <br/>
on the internet in october 2003 <br/>
as reported in message 11923 in real time tho the link has since died<br/>
& as reflected & enlarged upon in messages 11924 & 13192 & 13720<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
i have to wonder tho why you dont rather ask about btcninw in this connection<br/>
which was similarly affected by the same recognition<br/>
& which is also shown on your map <br/>
but which is evidently far more problematic than cninnpe<br/>
& for which there is a clear disagreement between your map & the data given in the <br/>
following article regarding the pass at jelep la<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.flonnet.com/fl2014/stories/20030718005201800.htm">http://www.flonnet.com/fl2014/stories/20030718005201800.htm</a><br/>
& which i havent yet been able to resolve<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> --- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;Jesper Nielsen&quot; &lt;jesniel@i...&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.indianexpress.com/full_story.php?content_id=68186">http://www.indianexpress.com/full_story.php?content_id=68186</a><br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/sikkim.jpg">http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/sikkim.jpg</a><br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.horizonsunlimited.com/gregfrazier/images/Sikkim.jpg">http://www.horizonsunlimited.com/gregfrazier/images/Sikkim.jpg</a> </span></blockquote></div>