Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: U.S. External Territories list<br/>
Date: Apr 11, 2005 @ 23:33<br/>
Author: Lowell G. McManus (&quot;Lowell G. McManus&quot; &lt;mcmanus71496@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="17325.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="17330.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic17292.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="17325.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="17327.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-788489446">I agree as to the two elucidations.  It was a matter of whether &quot;external&quot; meant <br/>
jurisdictionally or geographically.<br/>
<br/>
Lowell G. McManus<br/>
Leesville, Louisiana, USA<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> ----- Original Message ----- <br/>
From: &quot;aletheiak&quot; &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:aletheiak@...">aletheiak@...</a>&gt;<br/>
To: &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>&gt;<br/>
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 6:11 PM<br/>
Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: U.S. External Territories list<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.answers.com/topic/incorporated-territory">http://www.answers.com/topic/incorporated-territory</a><br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; also i believe if you go back & read carefully you will see there was never <br/>
&gt; any dispute<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; neither about what you say there was a dispute about<br/>
&gt; nor even about anything at all<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; but only 2 different elucidations of what the term external territories might <br/>
&gt; mean </span></blockquote></div>