Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Largest enclave<br/>
Date: Mar 13, 2001 @ 23:40<br/>
Author: David Mark (David Mark &lt;dmark@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="1729.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="1731.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic1638.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="1729.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="1731.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1167678682">On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Brendan Whyte wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; &gt;If an exclave is defined as a disconnected piece of a unit that one cannot<br/>
&gt; &gt;reach except by going through one or more other units of the same &#39;level&#39;.<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; So still landlocked? Rules out Kalinigrad?<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Not land locked-- land is irrelevant to the fiat objects we are dealing<br/>
with here. But land-plus-12-mile-limit-locked. If one can reach<br/>
international waters  from Kalingrad territory without passimg through<br/>
other countries&#39; sovereignty, then it is not an exclave or enclave.<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; And Jungholz is neither also?  So remains a pene-enclave and a <br/>
&gt; pene-exclave??<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>According to your definition, yes.<br/>
<br/>
David</div>