Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Ghost tp
Date: Mar 09, 2005 @ 16:23
Author: Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


Yes, also according to the German text.
 
Jesper
----- Original Message -----
From: marcelmiquelcat
To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 4:57 PM
Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Ghost tp


Is this the same bordermarker?

http://www.zollgeschichte.de/monatskarten/01_00.htm

marcel

--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, aletheia kallos
<aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> wow beauty
> & it evidently indicates a dry tripoint marked by depl
> monument 241
> the very rock in the 5th pic from the bottom of the
> sabaoth link
> yikes
> which i now see is even captioned dreilaenderstein
>
> busting both our guesses at once
>
> & contrary to versailles article 100 as well
>
> but probably an ad hoc decision by the commission in
> article 101
>
> & this same pic is also remarkable for appearing to
> show the alignment with another border rock in the
> near background
> resembling the blocky danzig poland series
> hence the hypothetical terminal rock e006
>
>
> & then returning to your friends map
> note the next divagation of the danzig german border
> from the nogat river
> above & opposite wernersdorf
> where it now seems even likelier that at least the
> danzig german f002 marker will be found & probably
> others
> possibly both f001 & f003
>
> --- Jesper Nielsen <jesniel@i...> wrote:
>
> > A reliable friend sent me this link of the topomap:
> >
> >
> http://www.chem.univ.gda.pl/~tomek/image/sztum1931.jpg
> >
> > Jesper
> > >thats strange
> > >since according to this site
> >
> >http://sabaoth.infoserve.pl/danzig-online/grenze/grenzee.html
> > >this tripoint was wet
> > >& specifically in the vistula river at the nogat
> > confluence
> > >where one might have expected only an indirect
> > demarcation
> > >& more likely by means of the terminal marker of
> > the e sector
> > >e006
> > >&or the initial marker of the f sector
> > >f001
> > >than by means of this apparent line stone numbered
> > f002
> > >
> > >for here the border evidently followed a fence line
> > >which suggests the location may be near wernersdorf
> >
> > >where the border did leave the river
> > >rather than near weissenberg
> > >where it didnt
> > >
> > >detail map & pix of the weissenberg & tripoint area
> > toward the
> > >bottom
> >
>
>
>
>
>      
>            
> __________________________________
> Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
> Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web
> http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/