if you fall or are a victim of anything wolfgang
& let me say i dont believe you or any of us is
then it is a victimhood only in & of your own belief
a belief in this case about victimhood itself
for in reality there are no victims of anything but
their own misperception or misunderstanding of what is
actually happening
we are all creating our own reality & our own
experience
with every belief & every thought we think
fully responsible & positively divine we are
so indeed all negativity is not just a nil & an ill
within ones creation
but is actually a lie
perhaps not a deliberate or conscious lie
& so some might consider it merely a slip or a
harmless indulgence when they do recognize it
but every negative belief is pernicious nonetheless
within ones own creation
in that it is self limiting or even self defeating
& thus it is a form of self damage that in your terms
one really could fall victim to
& i believe that is the only actual victimhood that is
even possible in this world
you do add some new nonsense claims here tho
which also lose sight of the basic meanings of things
for
normally & indeed always
so far as i know
boundary documentation is
the basic tale or info & proof of the boundary
&
boundary monumentation is
the reminder & demonstration of it
so confuse everything & dump victimhood on yourself
too if you absolutely must
tho of course i wish you wouldnt in our sight
& if you feel you must dump on others
please at least notice first that you have your head
up your ass
at the very least i think you owe jesper & dominic &
mike & perhaps everyone a retraction & correction
for referring to them in 16554 as victims
of anything
whether in connection with our recent & highly
illustrious afcnpk try or otherwise
& i think lowell owes you a similar apology &
correction for a similar misunderstanding of the word
victim in 16564
tho i agree with the rest of his finding
--- Wolfgang Schaub
<
Wolfgang.Schaub@...> wrote:
> I claim bordermarkers are d o c u m e n t s
> "normally". If they are
> monuments, something is wrong in the
> self-understanding of the nation who
> places them.
>
> But maybe I "fall victim" of a neo-European view of
> the world.
> -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: aletheiak [mailto:aletheiak@...]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2005 21:28
> An: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> Betreff: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Bordermarkers as
> monuments
>
>
>
> indeed wolfgang
> bordermarkers
> a r e
> monuments
>
> & they are also ordinarily called boundary
> monuments
>
>
> i liked your explanation of
> unbroken
> too
> tho it is actually the exact opposite of what mr
> nasarbajew meant
> as he was saying there would be no broken borders
> not no unbroken borders
> hahahahaha
>
> & your equating unbroken with plowed is lovely too
> even if also contrary to common sense
> & even tho my unabridged dictionary & i have never
> heard of that
> uncommon or nonexistent sense either
> of the word plough or plow
>
> but perhaps you can substantiate this
> for it is the second crazy plough claim we have
> heard this week
> hahahaha
>
>
> oh & please do explain what you meant by victim
> too in your
> previous slurry before you proceed to pile on any
> more
> nonsense
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Wolfgang
> Schaub"
> <Wolfgang.Schaub@c...> wrote:
> > Just two examples:
> >
> > 1) The East:
> >
> > If you walk from Simikot / Humla District,
> Western Nepal,
> upwards in the
> > valley of the Humla Karnali Goshi, you will,
> after a few days,
> cross the
> > Nara Lagna pass at 4580 m down into the valley.
> Near the
> hamlet Hilsa the
> > river forms the Nepalese/Tibetan boundary.
> Crossing the river -
> which is
> > easily possible on a bridge, absolutely devoid
> of controls - one
> climbs up a
> > promontory to reach the prominently looking
> Chinese
> "bordermarker", with the
> > characters for "zhong" and "guo" - Land of the
> Middle - facing
> Nepal (!),
> > something which is unusual for Western
> bordermarkers. Not
> only this, but
> > also the fact that the dark-grey concrete pillar
> is about 200 m
> off the
> > river bed indicates it is meant as a "warning"
> against all wild
> barbarians =
> > non-Chinese, to keep off and be impressed.
> >
> > Walking on into Tibet, next came the village
> Sher - 3600 m -
> and a few miles
> > later the bigger village of Kojarnath. Here is
> the first Chinese
> police
> > station, with a timid young Chinese police
> officer holding out in
> his
> > hopeless position among hostile Tibetan locals.
> No controls
> either. Further
> > on, after another few miles, you will reach the
> little town of
> > Purong/Taklakot, where tea is waiting in the
> local guest house.
> Here you
> > will be met by Chinese green-uniform officials
> who will check
> your
> > passports, and, most important, stamp them, will
> have an
> interested look
> > into the smaller bags - the larger rucksacks
> remain
> unchecked. Finally the
> > friendly officials will stand up, together with
> the entire party, for
> an
> > "international friendship" group snapshot
> outside of the office.
> Afterwards
> > you are free to do whatever you like in Tibet -
> provided you find
> something
> > to eat.
> >
> > Sorry, the pictures that I have are in my photo
> album.
> >
> > 2) The Soviet style:
> >
> > You best take the former inner-German border. It
> was
> "ploughed" and
> > "unbroken", to speak in Mr. Nasarbajew's
> terminology.
> Ploughed means there
> > was a broad, staggered security strip, with
> watchtowers and
> shooting ranges,
> > so that anybody trying to cross the border - an
> absolute crime
> in
> > communism - could easily be detected and
> "liquidated".
> Unbroken means it was
> > completely tight, no holes in between. The
> border fortification
> line did not
> > follow the "official" delineation - there have
> been deviations of
> up to
> > several hundred metres. I remember a place in
> Bavaria,
> where, next to the
> > sidewalk of a West German road, there stood the
> East German
> border marker in
> > a deep forest, while the "real" border was far
> away "ploughing"
> through a
> > better controllable back-country area. These
> were places
> where you could
> > take foreign visitors to when they wanted to be
> thrilled by
> stepping into
> > East Germany un-punished.
> >
> > In other words: The boundary fortifications
> served as a
> monument of warning.
> >
> > Wolfgang
>
>
>
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an
> email to:
> BoundaryPoint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
> Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
> __________ NOD32 1.961 (20041230) Information
> __________
>
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
http://my.yahoo.com