Subject: Re: Strovilia, and two more defacto tripoints (visited)
Date: Jan 20, 2005 @ 19:13
Author: aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


well yes we know all this
but you were asking about the actual tripoints
between 1974 & 2000
werent you
& whether they exist or count
or what they even were
etc
rather than just asking about the nearest convenient thing to them

so that is why i am continuing the pursuit of the actual tripoints
from where you have left off here

clearly the markers did not mark the actual tripoints but were just a
convenience in knowing the approximate locations of them

--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@i...>
wrote:
> UNFICYP made the cease fire line agreement, which both greeks and
turks agreed on.
>
> So UNFICYP must have closed of the line, and cleverly used the
already physical markers.
>
> The road from marker 237 plus the land south east of Agios Nikolaos
down to the buffer zone is in any case occupied by the Turks.
>
> Jesper
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: aletheiak
> To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 7:30 PM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Strovilia, and two more defacto
tripoints (visited)
>
>
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
<jesniel@i...>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > also jesper
> > usually
> > for dejure there is diplomatic recognition & explicit
tripartite
> agreement with ratifications etc
> >
> > but you know dejure is just a more refined development of
defacto
> anyway
> >
> > everything is defacto but only the most completed & refined
> confections deserve the name of dejure
> >
> >
> > also i am curious
> >
> > how did you decide on these exact markers as the exact
tripoints
> >
> > I have seen a map made by UNFICYP
> >
> > Jesper
>
> well ok but you say in
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.culture.discuss.boundary-point/5953
> that the turks only reached the north side of the road
> yet you show marker 237 on the south side of the road
> & you also indicate a turnpoint opposite it in red line
>
> so dont you rather mean that this imaginary turnpoint is actually
the
> best available approximation of the eastern tripoint
> rather than marker 237 per se
> & that in any event both markers 233 & 237 are merely best
available
> approximations of what are actually rather more indefinite
tripoints
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> BoundaryPoint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.