Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] more peculiar maricopa & atwood survey findings
Date: Dec 10, 2004 @ 05:00
Author: Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
----- Original Message -----From: aletheia kallosSent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 9:11 PMSubject: [BoundaryPoint] more peculiar maricopa & atwood survey findingsmy ongoing try for a first arizona tricounty point visit class ahas settled on & continues to focus on maricopa county because of her relatively high population density & development level & the relative accessibility of her cornersbut after a virtual perambulation & closer look at all her tripoints on topozone i have to report that any apparent or presumptive advantages she may have had have actually not born any monumental fruit at all yet & dont look like they necessarily willof lamaya you already know the most likely particulars& traveling from there clockwise or eastbound along maya to the gila tripoint at gimayathru the continuous or discontinuous sequence of 30 numbered corner markersof which quite a few are missing from the topo as number 2 was but may still be recovered tooi find gimaya is depicted as the unmarked trijunction of a ridge line convergent on giya & the continuous maya & gima geodetic convergents that fall between maya marker 30 & gima marker 31evidently of the same continuous original series begun at lamayaof course gimaya might be marked by a corner marker number 30a that isnt shown on the topobut if so that remains to be demonstratednext continuing along gima comes pinalso thats gimapior maybe i should say eccentrically gimapin to distinguish her from pima who is coming nextyikesbut againthis one too is depicted as unmarkedpima comes next continuing along mapiso thats mapipiyikesor mapimpinyikes again& tho i dont know which name is worsefortunately she is not far from kakawhich gives a little cover& this one too is shown as unmarkedtho her location does offer hope of a public land survey corner pinin fact the only maricopa tricounty hope i have found for class acontinuing west along mapim to yuma countymapiyu or mapimyu is reached& the atwood 113d20m long line is regainedbut no marker is shownworse yetthe freakin corner isnt flush but appears to jog significantlyoopsbut i will get back to that after i close the perambulationby simply continuing north now along mayu to lamayuwhere again no marker is shown& finally looping the loop by following lama from there to lamayanowthe 113d20m atwood line from which i began & along which i have also closed the perambulation& which is supposed to have been run continuously in 1918 from the santa maria river to the mexican border does not in fact appear have been marked that wayif the sequence of 51 markers running north from near mapimyu thru lamayu to near lamaya are its productiona detail which i cant yet verifysince these could of course be a later series toobut there are no markers at all shown by usgs anywhere along pimyuthe southernmost leg of the 113d20m atwood linenot at the mapimyu point & jog& not even at the mexican border& how the heck did that jog creep in there anywayif all this is supposed to be so rigorously atwoodiandid he himself introduce itindeed is there any evidence that he himself set anything more than an initial rock at 34 lat& that anything else we find on his line is his actual doingi havent found any yetso anywayi dont know where to continue on to from herebut if anyone notices a hotter tricounty marker prospect anywhere in arizona than has been identified at mapimpin aka kakamy last maricopa chance if anywould they please let me knowor bag it themselvesthanx & beeps
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! Try it today!