Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Fw: AFCNPK photo<br/>
Date: Oct 24, 2004 @ 21:35<br/>
Author: Michael Kaufman (Michael Kaufman &lt;mikekaufman79@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="15841.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="15843.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic15841.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="15841.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="15843.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-523147090">Perhaps it is not the real tripoint.  I would think it<br/>
would be 1 (or a really high number) if it were.  Any<br/>
agreements/treaties found?<br/>
<br/>
--- Jesper Nielsen &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:jesniel@...">jesniel@...</a>&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; <br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; A visitor to Borderbase has just supplied me with<br/>
&gt; this scan of AFCNPK.<br/>
&gt;  <br/>
&gt;  The place looks very remote<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt;<br/>
 </span></blockquote><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://sunsite.berkeley.edu:8085/tajikistan/100k/10-43-102.jpg">http://sunsite.berkeley.edu:8085/tajikistan/100k/10-43-102.jpg</a><br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; , but yet<br/>
&gt;  demarcated.<br/>
&gt;  <br/>
&gt;  But why the number 2?<br/>
&gt;  <br/>
&gt;  Jesper<br/>
&gt;  <br/>
<br/>
&gt; ATTACHMENT part 2 image/jpeg name=Pak-Afg-Chi.jpg<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
		<br/>
 </span></blockquote>_______________________________<br/>
Do you Yahoo!?<br/>
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://vote.yahoo.com">http://vote.yahoo.com</a></div>