Subject: Re: ATCHLIN
Date: Aug 19, 2004 @ 21:55
Author: aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
<jesniel@i...> wrote:
> The discussed marker 136 on CH side of Rhein bank.
> All sides said S by the way, and is NOT placed where Mats
sugested earlier.
>
> The poor quality is due to darkness.
>
> Jesper, who thinks Mike Donner should take lessions in
communication, no seriously!

offcourse i should
but i do seem to have communicated pretty well to you guys too
at least for class a
sometimes

it is just taking a while for some folks to fully appreciate class b
etc


but anyway what did atczde feeel like
or yikes did you actually see it too

or maybe even held a camera up to it

that must have been so cool any way tho


& thanx for leaving atchlis a virgin

there are not too many left in the schengen area

of course you all still get olympic credit for the try tho


also
it appears you were all pretty well satisfied that the cross center
at jungholz marks the true border cross point
but is that an act of faith
or is it because you actually checked the measurements from
the reference markers

in your absence
we just found reason to doubt the baarle border cross marker

& i also just saw a news report today suggesting that the bengali
border cross
& all bdin river borders in general
could shift
from the thalweg
where we were led to believe they are
to the median line

cant be too careful with the buggers

> ------
> Borderbase - your online guide to international borders
> http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase