Subject: Re: taiwan daring to fully inflate its national territory<br/>
Date: Jun 09, 2004 @ 21:13<br/>
Author: geoh88 (&quot;geoh88&quot; &lt;geoh88@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="14308.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="14334.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic14308.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="14329.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="14331.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1161585876">Just an amazing number of exceptionally obviously ridiculous <br/>
misstatements of geographical and political &quot;facts&quot;:<br/>
Spratlys 70 km north of Hong Kong???????<br/>
Next paragraph, mixing up Spratlys and Pratas????????<br/>
No concept of long-standing military occupation by other <br/>
countries?????????<br/>
<br/>
Nonetheless, assuming that at least the first sentence is correct, <br/>
this draft national land planning law does not specify Wu ch-iu yu <br/>
(spelling?), which I have often seen portrayed as a tiny island <br/>
group occupied by Taiwan, roughly midway between Kinmen and Matsu, <br/>
fairly close to the mainland China coast?<br/>
<br/>
Any information on this?<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@o...&gt; <br/>
wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; <br/>
 </span></blockquote><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2004/06/02/2003157898">http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2004/06/02/2003157898</a></div>