Subject: Re: Gibraltar
Date: Jun 08, 2004 @ 22:14
Author: geoh88 ("geoh88" <geoh88@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Kevin Meynell <knm@m...> wrote:
>
> >In the past, I would have been inclined to argue that Gibraltar
was a
> >separate country from GB&NI for purposes such as these,
especially since
> >the UK government tries to categorize Gibraltar as being
> >Overseas
>
> It would consider that it's effectively a separate country/state,
> particularly since there are immigration controls between the UK
and
> Gibraltar. It's certainly not an integral part of the United
Kingdom.
>
> >but since I have read that there is now a district for the EU
elections
> >consisting of Gibraltar and a part of Southwest England, I
suppose I must
> >reconsider.
>
> That's another issue. Gibraltar is the only UK overseas territory
that is
> part of the EU, but for various reasons, was never allowed to
participate
> in the European Parliamentary elections. However, this was
successfully
> challenged in the European Court of Human Rights which ruled that
the
> Gibraltarians should not be disenfranchised as decisions of the
European
> Parliament applied to them.
>
> Unfortunately, the population of Gibraltar is too small to justify
a
> separate constituency, and as the citizens of Gibraltar are
considered to
> be UK citizens for EU purposes, the only option was to include the
> territory in one of the UK electoral regions. It was considered
most
> appropriate to place it in the South-West Region of England as
this
> traditionally had the closest ties to the territory.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kevin Meynell