Subject: thames headstream choice still hanging
Date: Jun 03, 2004 @ 21:44
Author: m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next
Prev    Post in Time    Next


returning yesterday to state line pond
i failed again to reach the elusive mouth of sawmill brook
as the neighborhood was too swampy to just slog on over to it
& no flotation was readily available to put to the task either
while the available time was too short to improvise further

but i was struck again by how much more water seemed to be exiting the pond
over the dam than i could confirm was entering it from the east by the
unnamed stream & approaching it from the lowest bridge on sawmill brook

clearly the other feeder streams
particularly some coming in from the northwest & west side
must contribute a substantial proportion of the water too

& there will in fact be no simple formula available to lean on
like
inflows a plus b nearly equal outflow c
as i had hoped

instead it turns out there are at least 4 major inflows plus several minor
ones contributing to the outflow
& while none of the other inflows can compete with the 2 biggest ones i have
been trying to compare
nevertheless taken all together they do throw my approximations for a loop
& set me back to either importing a canoe or comparing watershed areas as
shown on the topos

or in other words i took a few pix but made no real progress to speak of


today
still scratching my head over this temporary show stopper
& realizing all 3 of my free travel opportunities had already slipped away
i experimented a little with printing topozone topos at my local library
just to see if i could distinguish & compare watersheds well enough using
such a low tech means
& thus improve upon or cut corners from my remaining options

& directly i began trying to surround my shed puzzle by printing a patchwork
of maps in this way
when either the library computer or the topozone site quit on me

but i did determine the method should be doable in principle
provided the margin of difference isnt so thin as to throw the result back
into the range of pure guesswork

& i also guessed that the procedure
however elaborate & drawn out it might become
could be preferable to either slinging a canoe or ordering usgs topo sheets
& waiting for them to arrive

so
to be continued as early as tomorrow



but in the meantime
a question for truth seekers

when a dam causes several confluences in the stream above it to all rise
together to the level of the resulting pond
as has actually occurred in the case of state line pond
should all the confluences still be analyzed in the original but now
submerged ascending sequence of the natural thalweg
so as to assess at every ghost fork in succession which contributary would
be channeling more water

or should the pond as a whole be considered a single multiple confluence of
all its feeders at once
& the single biggest one of them declared the main headstream outright
somewhat like a candidate winning a single election by a mere plurality over
all others
rather than winning a series of primaries &or runoffs by clear majorities in
every case

in other words does the presence of the artificial dam alter the natural
principle of the sawanabori


i can foresee 2 different outcomes depending on how this question is
answered

& i have already satisfied myself as to how i would answer it
but still wonder what anyone else thinks

_________________________________________________________________
Watch the online reality show Mixed Messages with a friend and enter to win
a trip to NY
http://www.msnmessenger-download.click-url.com/go/onm00200497ave/direct/01/