Subject: Re: Hungarian southern tripoints<br/>
Date: Apr 25, 2004 @ 13:31<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="14068.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic14068.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="14068.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="14070.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1073881906">--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;pete2784west&quot; <br/>
&lt;pete2784west@y...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; Since the time Yugoslavia disintegrated, Hungary&#39;s got two <br/>
 </span></blockquote>new <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; neighbours at the southern border. Does anyone of you know <br/>
 </span></blockquote>what is <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; the situation about the tripoints Slovenia-Croatia-Hungary and <br/>
&gt; Croatia-Serbia-Hungary? Is there a tri-state treaty about them? <br/>
 </span></blockquote>Are <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; they marked in any way than just only on map? Is there a <br/>
 </span></blockquote>dispute <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; about them?  <br/>
&gt; I looked at some of your pages (Rolf, Jesper, Peter etc.) from <br/>
 </span></blockquote>your <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; trips around tripoints in Central Europe, but not much on <br/>
 </span></blockquote>them...<br/>
<br/>
i believe that the uncertainty & vagueness about both of these <br/>
tripoints<br/>
hrhusi & cshrhu <br/>
or formerly hrhuyu <br/>
is greater than necessary<br/>
<br/>
in the case of each one <br/>
2 distinct probable positions exist<br/>
owing to the differing interpretations of the former internal yugo <br/>
borders by their post yugo successor entities<br/>
<br/>
but i believe all 4 of the disputed positions are distinct positions<br/>
<br/>
for the bp executive summary on both of these points to date <br/>
please see messages<br/>
9665 <br/>
7658 <br/>
7107 <br/>
5382 <br/>
5377 <br/>
5372<br/>
<br/>
beyond these data<br/>
all of which date back to 2002 or earlier<br/>
no subsequent developments have been reported<br/>
which is not to say that there havent been any<br/>
but just that we are unaware of them</div>