Interesting fork in the road there!
Also, today's news of the secret bbgy EEZ agreement appears to
confirm that a bbgytt EEZ tripoint must emerge too.
http://www.newsday.co.tt/stories.php?article_id=14411
Or, it could be, a bbgytt tri-LINE -- if the bbgy EEZ convergence is
to include a co-exclusive zone, as the report also appears to say.
Aletheia
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Smaardijk"
<smaardijk@y...> wrote:
> The feeling in Surinam seems to be that Guyana is trying to
separate
> the maritime boundary dispute from that in the Courantyne river
> (Thalweg vs. left bank border) and the New River Triangle
dispute.
> Thats why Guyana is adressing the ITLOS.
>
> If Surinam succeeds in maintaining that all boundary disputes
are
> connected, then ITLOS wouldn't be the way to solve them. A
Surinamese
> lawyer proposes in the Surinam newspaper De Ware Tijd that
Surinam
> should take the disputes to the International Court of Justice in
the
> Hague instead ( http://tinyurl.com/2cz2w ; in Dutch). In that
case,
> BRGYSR is another tripoint that would enter this story.
>
> Peter S.
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "aletheiak"
<aletheiak@y...>
> wrote:
> > Thanks. It's a very close call though. Their equidistance
tripoint
> > appears to fall at almost exactly 200 nautical miles!
> >
> >
http://www.trinidadexpress.com/index.pl/article_politics?id=1246
> > 7339
> >
http://www.trinidadexpress.com/index.pl/article_politics?id=1246
> > 7335
> >
> > Aletheia
> >
> >
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "m06079"
> > <barbaria_longa@h...> wrote:
> > > welcome a k & nice stuff
> > >
> > > it appears at least a bbgytt eez tripoint may well hang in the
> > > balance over all this
> > >
> > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "aletheiak"
> > > <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> > > > http://tinyurl.com/3bud9
> > > >
> > > > Greetings,
> > > >
> > > > A. Kallos