Subject: Re: BoundaryPoint - More tightening<br/>
Date: Feb 11, 2004 @ 00:18<br/>
Author: m06079 (&quot;m06079&quot; &lt;barbaria_longa@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="13145.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="13147.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic13119.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="13145.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="13147.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1595029544">--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, Kevin Meynell <br/>
&lt;knm@m...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; Mike,<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt;maybe these points were missed because their names were <br/>
 </span></blockquote>unfamiliar to <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; &gt;newer members<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Your admirable multipointing credentials have never been in <br/>
 </span></blockquote>question. <br/>
<br/>
yes i agree<br/>
so thats not what this is about<br/>
good<br/>
<br/>
The <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; question is whether there is any scope in this group to provide <br/>
 </span></blockquote>some <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; context as to why multipoints exist in the first place<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>good question<br/>
i would think so<br/>
& i for one would be quite interested in learning why they do exist <br/>
in the first place<br/>
excellent<br/>
<br/>
, or even to add <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; occasional humorous anecdotes about those things that <br/>
 </span></blockquote>thwart our quest? <br/>
<br/>
interesting<br/>
please clarify what you mean by <br/>
our quest <br/>
& also what you mean by <br/>
those things that thwart it<br/>
<br/>
It <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; would seem this is allowed for certain members of the group, <br/>
 </span></blockquote>but not others <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; despite the much-vaunted personal sovereignty of each of us.<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>wait<br/>
to me it seems everything is equally allowed here for all<br/>
<br/>
indeed the whole world is equally free for all<br/>
isnt it<br/>
<br/>
& that proposition must apply especially to bp & this our most <br/>
beloved everyones land<br/>
dont you think<br/>
<br/>
so i really dont know what you are talking about here kevin<br/>
<br/>
nor do i think group consensus has anything to do with it<br/>
<br/>
being on point & on target has everything to do with it<br/>
<br/>
being true to the purpose of the group has everything to do with it<br/>
<br/>
& members who are both slobbery about that & voluble as well <br/>
& then negatively oriented on top of all that <br/>
do tend to make a laughing stock of themselves <br/>
for being so persistently off the beam<br/>
<br/>
& i am here equally as free as you to enjoy it all with you<br/>
<br/>
& my questions really are my questions<br/>
<br/>
& i wish you would really answer some of them<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
the consistency is already provided by cosmic law<br/>
& it is already very nice <br/>
as well as very empowering to know<br/>
<br/>
you get what you vibrate<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
 I&#39;m happy to <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; live with the group consensus on this, but it would be nice to <br/>
 </span></blockquote>have some <br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt; consistency.<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Cheers,<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Kevin Meynell </span></blockquote></div>