Subject: Re: CZDEPL<br/>
Date: Jan 28, 2004 @ 17:15<br/>
Author: m06079 (&quot;m06079&quot; &lt;barbaria_longa@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="12939.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic12939.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="12961.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="12963.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-476755938">--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;Jesper Nielsen&quot; &lt;jesniel@i...&gt; <br/>
wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; we never saw this angle on GCEBE<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>because you were standing in germany with your left side toward this <br/>
camera position <br/>
& wading in or across was not an option<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
btw i have come to agree with your czdepl assessment in message 4673<br/>
& several others of your stream junction tripoint tries too<br/>
since <br/>
according to bus&ss<br/>
there really does appear to be some traditional basis for preferring <br/>
your midway between the banks thesis to my thalweg idea<br/>
in general<br/>
except <br/>
as i recall <br/>
when a stream is navigable all the way to & from the sea<br/>
which none of the streams in question would appear to be<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt; <br/>
&gt; <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://mitglied.lycos.de/FlaeschnerRamona/grenze.htm">http://mitglied.lycos.de/FlaeschnerRamona/grenze.htm</a> </span></blockquote></div>