Subject: boundary crosses  was RE: [BoundaryPoint] Historic geographic anomalies<br/>
Date: Jan 02, 2001 @ 02:18<br/>
Author: michael donner (michael donner &lt;m@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="1166.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="1168.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic1144.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="1166.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="1168.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1471192998">dear mats<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;I have seen the discussions on this list as to what<br/>
&gt;constitutes an enclave or an exclave. For example,<br/>
&gt;we don&#39;t seem to be able to agree upon whether Jungholz<br/>
&gt;is an exclave or not. But it certainly is a geographic<br/>
&gt;anomaly, isn&#39;t it? And a unique and very interesting<br/>
&gt;one, too.<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>actually we have reason to hope it is not unique<br/>
for it may prove to be 1 of perhaps 5 similar international boundary crosses<br/>
  aka binational quadripoints<br/>
with probably 1 or 2 or 3 more like it in baarle<br/>
& likewise in bengal<br/>
<br/>
now with your & jespers ability to read small measurements in baarle & to<br/>
visit the scene relatively easily<br/>
you may be the first to positively confirm some of these<br/>
<br/>
i believe one of them may be marked on the ground by a cobblestone cross<br/>
<br/>
good luck & vis tecum<br/>
m</div>