Subject: Re: BoundaryPoint and borders<br/>
Date: Sep 04, 2003 @ 17:14<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="11537.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="11544.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic11510.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="11537.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="11539.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1724389979">--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;marcelmiquelcat&quot; <br/>
&lt;marcelmiquel@v...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; <br/>
&gt; I love this group as actually works.<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt;  The &quot;boundary delimitation&quot; between boundary and point is <br/>
 </span></blockquote>not so <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; easy: think just about this question: where the enclaves would <br/>
 </span></blockquote>be <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; discussed, if a sister group would be created?<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; marcel<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>the clavers have been embedded here almost from day 1<br/>
& obviously we wouldnt have it any other way<br/>
<br/>
i guess that is de facto tho <br/>
rather than de jure</div>