See question below:
> ----------
> From: m06079[SMTP:barbaria_longa@...]
> Reply To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 5:21 PM
> To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: BoundaryPoint and borders
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G. McManus"
> <mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:
> > I agree with Jesper. When I found this group, I was searching
> Yahoo Groups for a group that discusses boundaries. If there
> was none, I was prepared to establish one. Instead, I found this
> group and joined it. I'm glad that I did, and I have learned a great
> amount.
> >
> > To me, the topics of multipoints and boundaries are almost
> inseparable. After all, how can there be multipoints without
> boundaries?
>
> a fair point & a fair question
>
> likewise how can there be boundaries without countries
>
> & how can there be countries without planets or molecules etc
>
> however
> it is not the general neighborhood but multihood itself that is the
> unique & most essential truth & primary motivation behind bp
>
> & far the greatest value & fun for me at least has been in the
> pursuit of the multidimensional reality that is symbolized & to
> some extent really activated by our multipointing here at bp
>
> as an organization this is what makes us unique on the planet
>
> there are other boundary discussion groups
>
Where are these groups?
> there is only one multipointing group
> only one true gymnasium for multidimensional truthseeking
> at least so far as i am aware of
>
> so it seems to me
> unless one is engaged in the pursuit of the manyness here
> one is fundamentally missing the point of here
>
> which is ok as you know
>
More than OK, it is in fact part of the purpose stated on the BP
home page, which does not limit BP exclusively to discussion of
multi-points, but simply singles that out as a topic of especial interest.