responding to jesper
in one of many recent sky shots that never landed
>unless we want to break precedent & introduce new regimes of
>encipherment
>we need to continue using code elements for this purpose
>comprising 2 letters only
>
>in this regard the iso system is incomplete
>& indeed more miss than hit
>
>however
>for what i think you are asking
>i often use & would recommend gwillim laws hasc statoid codes
>http://www.mindspring.com/~gwil/details.html#codes
>since these are all of 2 letters
>& already more hit than miss
>in fact nearly complete & ready made to our specs worldwide
>
>--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
><jesniel@i...> wrote:
> > Isn't ISO 3166-2 what we are looking for to name our second
>division borders and
>tripoints?http://www.niso.org/standards/resources/3166.html#31
>66-2
> >
> > Is it only me who cannot find the list?
> >
> > Jesper
> > --
> > Borderbase - your online guide to international borders
> > http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase
>
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8: Get 6 months for $9.95/month.
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup