Subject: DE2HENWRP<br/>
Date: Aug 27, 2003 @ 20:13<br/>
Author: Peter Smaardijk (&quot;Peter Smaardijk&quot; &lt;smaardijk@...&gt;)<br/>
Prev&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next<br/>
<a href="11435.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="11437.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1585936587">According to <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://tinyurl.com/le76">http://tinyurl.com/le76</a> , <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://tinyurl.com/le79">http://tinyurl.com/le79</a> is the <br/>
tripoint.<br/>
But acc. to <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://staff-www.uni-marburg.de/~braemer/rotcart.htm">http://staff-www.uni-marburg.de/~braemer/rotcart.htm</a> , <br/>
the tripoint is wet (in the Ketzerbach). The first site also shows <br/>
this ( <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://tinyurl.com/le88">http://tinyurl.com/le88</a> ) picture as being the tripoint. So <br/>
maybe this stone is one of a pair, or maybe the tripoint is dry after <br/>
all.<br/>
<br/>
Peter S.</div>