Subject: Re: NW corner TX panhandle<br/>
Date: Jun 09, 2003 @ 06:18<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="10426.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="10430.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic10379.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="10428.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="10430.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-444236929">the photo linked in message 10400 makes the corner of texas <br/>
seem to cross the road entirely<br/>
& it is hard for me to doubt the reality & relative accuracy of the <br/>
fence lines <br/>
not only as shown there<br/>
but also as previously eyeballed by me on the ground<br/>
so i have to wonder <br/>
perhaps the 24k topo is overworked when magnified to 6k scale <br/>
& is it possible that the far shoulder is the one indicated by the <br/>
other data you mention<br/>
<br/>
also the photo makes it seem like there was a recent or ongoing <br/>
road widening project there<br/>
which could have substantially changed the relationships & <br/>
alignments from how we ourselves recall them<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
also<br/>
rambling on & doubling up to save messages<br/>
as i am getting sleepy<br/>
i do agree with you about highway 340 near mdvawv<br/>
& dont see how there could possibly be 2 virginia stretches there<br/>
<br/>
nor btw how there could possibly be anything but safety around <br/>
here<br/>
<br/>
as you have observed<br/>
he who is happy goes lucky <br/>
which of course includes safe<br/>
<br/>
& thanx to our precision try pointing <br/>
& the deliberate creation it engenders<br/>
lucky us <br/>
perfectly safe <br/>
by just continuing to point at what we like<br/>
& thus continuing to live happily ever after<br/>
<br/>
good night all <br/>
<br/>
--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, &quot;jparsell&quot; <br/>
&lt;jparsell@n...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; On this NAD83, 1:6000 Topozone map it appears that the <br/>
 </span></blockquote>marker is off<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; the pavement, but within the road right of way.  As I recall the <br/>
 </span></blockquote>Clark<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; Monument was near the edge of the road and was a collision <br/>
 </span></blockquote>hazard, so<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; it was removed and replaced at the same location by an under <br/>
 </span></blockquote>ground<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; marker referenced by two witness poles located well away <br/>
 </span></blockquote>from the highway.<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; <br/>
&gt; <br/>
 </span></blockquote>http://test.topozone.com/map.asp?z=13&n=4041232&e=675387<br/>
&s=6&u=2&datum=nad83<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; &layer=DRG25<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Jack<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt;  -----Original Message-----<br/>
&gt; From: acroorca2002 [mailto:orc@o...]<br/>
&gt; Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 2:47 PM<br/>
&gt; To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com<br/>
&gt; Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Hancok, MD<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt;   for the very shortest such<br/>
&gt;   consider<br/>
&gt;   <br/>
 </span></blockquote>http://www.topozone.com/map.asp?z=13&n=4041216&e=67516<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;   8&s=25<br/>
&gt;   at the northwest corner of the texas panhandle<br/>
&gt;   where both rumor & fence lines indicate texas gets barely <br/>
 </span></blockquote>nipped<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;   by the eastbound lane<br/>
&gt;   & not at all by the westbound lane<br/>
&gt;   of us56&64<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt;   depending on which side of the vehicle one is sitting in<br/>
&gt;   the travel distance might be measured in inches rather than <br/>
 </span></blockquote>feet<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt; <br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; ---<br/>
&gt; Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.<br/>
&gt; Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).<br/>
&gt; Version: 6.0.486 / Virus Database: 284 - Release Date: 5/29/03 </span></blockquote></div>