Where does Kupedi/Kudepe go after passing Zaiceva?
Does it really flow to EELVRU?
Unfortunately it's ouside my map.
Attached another map.
Jesper
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Topomap:
EELVRU
> Since Russia had not yet rattified the border, the
tripoint is not yet
> defined and so they can only start restoring the
EELV border NEAR the
> tripoint.
>
> And since they can
only put a marker on land, the physial restoration of
> the border can
only happen NEAR the tripoint.
>
> Makes sence?
>
>
Jesper
> ----- Original Message -----
>
From: acroorca2002
> To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 6:02 PM
>
Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Topomap: EELVRU
>
>
> yes it does seem likely that the kudedi or kudepi is the
same as
> the laykchne
>
> in
which case monument 1 stands between & just above its
>
confluence with the pedetsi or pededze
>
> however
> the tripoint position itself
> both
the actual one if any & the prospective one if any
different
> doesnt appear to be directly addressed in this
message at all
> & evidently remains either unknown or
a closely held secret
>
> & i would have been
content to just continue to assume that it
> falls &
will continue to fall at the thalweg junction
> as some
believe the map really indicates anyway
> according to an
arcane cartographical convention
> despite the position of
the vee point actually shown on the west
> or right bank of
the pededze
>
> but
> your
informant does definitely indicate
> that the 1990s border
restoration began near the tripoint
> as he says
> on the right coast
> of the
pededze
>
> now if the tripoint isnt really on the
right coast aka west bank
> then why bother restoring the
border on the west bank
>
> so i think this express
detail
> in conjunction with the fact that the vee point is
actually shown by
> the map on the west bank
> cartographic convention
notwithstanding
> may well be most telling of its true
location
> actual as well as prospective
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
> <jesniel@i...> wrote:
> > Here
is what I have received from EE authorities regarding
>
EELV(RU):
> >
> >
---
> >
> > Thank you for your
interest in Estonian international borders.
>
Initial
> > position of Estonian-Latvian border was
defined by a protocol
> issued by
> >
border arbiter British Colonel Tallents in 1920. The borderline
> was further
> > refined by
conventions, agreements and protocols signed
> between
Estonia and
> > Latvia in 1920, 1923 and 1927 as well as
by resolutions
> agreed by
> >
Estonian-Latvian Joint Border Commission. The border built in
> 1922-1927 was
> > restored in
1992-1999. Adjustments in the actual borderline
> caused
by
> > changes during the 70-year period were introduced
by
> EstonianLatvian Joint
> > Border
Commission in coordination with local municipalities
> from
both sides.
> > Rumours that the border splits buildings
in the Valga/Valka
> border town are
>
> a misconception.
> >
> > The
Estonian-Latvian borderline build in 1922-1927 started
>
from the border
> > mark no. 1 at the
Russian-Estonian-Latvian borders' junction
>
point
> > (tripoint) situated at the west bank of the
Kudepi River and
> ended at the
> >
mark no. 442 at the coast of Livonian Bay.
> > Estonia
restored the border from the mark no. 46+1379 near
> the
tripoint and
> > situating on the right coast of the
Pedetsi River, to the mark no.
> 219
near
> > the Valga river. From the mark no. 219 to no.
442
> (Ainazi/Heinaste) the
> > border
was restored by Latvia.
> >
> >
Position of the tripoint depends also from Russian Federation.
> There exist a
> > preliminary
agreement about the triple point, but we cannot
> publish
the maps
> > about the tripoint as well as border lines
around that before
> this agreement
>
> is accepted by the governments of Estonia and Russia.
>
>
> > -----------
> >
> > But where is Kudedi river?
> >
On the attached map the EELV border river is called something
> else
> >
(Laykchne?)
> >
> > If the border
was marked in the 20'es. Can these markers still
> be
found. Or
> > did the Soviets really remove
them?
> >
> > Jesper
>
>
> Yahoo!
Groups Sponsor
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
>
>
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.