- Oklahoma / Texas Border - River Borders
The Texas border stops at the southern edge of the Red River. I have heard conflicting information about the start of the Oklahoma border. I have heard
Nov 05, 2003 @ 17:38 - voit1 ("voit1" <voit1@...>)
- Re: Oklahoma / Texas Border - River Borders
... yes odd nothing like that at the time of my visit to aroktx if that is the point you are focussing on & please see messages 11383 & 9759 ... it is
Nov 05, 2003 @ 18:13 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Oklahoma / Texas Border - River Borders
Many examples: MDVA, in which MD controls the Potomac up to the VA shoreline; KYOH, WVOH, KYIN, KYIL, DENJ ... From: voit1 [mailto:voit1@airmail.net] Sent:
Nov 05, 2003 @ 21:02 - Flynn, Kevin ("Flynn, Kevin" <flynnk@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Oklahoma / Texas Border - River Borders
Here s the latest on the OKTX boundary, of which some are apparently unaware: The boundary was drastically rectified and permanently established in the Red
Nov 06, 2003 @ 00:26 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Oklahoma / Texas Border - River Borders
SO the compact overrides all of the boundary lines we see on dry land on Topozone, including the old meanders. and substitutes a living, moving boundary?
Nov 06, 2003 @ 00:42 - Flynn, Kevin ("Flynn, Kevin" <flynnk@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Oklahoma / Texas Border - River Borders
NH-VT, et al ... __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
Nov 06, 2003 @ 01:12 - Michael Kaufman (Michael Kaufman <mikekaufman79@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Oklahoma / Texas Border - River Borders
Yes! The compact sends cartographers back to the drawing boards with their erasers in hand. A well-trained monkey could now find the OKTX boundary on a
Nov 06, 2003 @ 01:28 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
- Re: Oklahoma / Texas Border - River Borders
... with their ... boundary on a ... & i hope you will train him to take short cuts or he might never finish his job but we have been here before perhaps
Nov 06, 2003 @ 16:04 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
- Re: Oklahoma / Texas Border - River Borders
the full dozen were given in message 11897
Nov 06, 2003 @ 16:08 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Oklahoma / Texas Border - River Borders
CORRECTION ... the ... Of course, I know that it s Lake Texoma, not Lake Tacoma, but my spell-checker didn t! Lowell G. McManus Leesville, Louisiana, USA
Nov 06, 2003 @ 16:22 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
- Re: Oklahoma / Texas Border - River Borders
I m a bit puzzled by the term vegetation line. If somebody clears away the plants on their property on the south side of the river, does that change the
Nov 06, 2003 @ 17:30 - adamnvillani ("adamnvillani" <avillani@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Oklahoma / Texas Border - River Borders
You are correct that the compact s OKTX does require a lurch or stitch to reach the AROKTX tripoint, but I would argue the matter this way: The southern
Nov 06, 2003 @ 17:44 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Oklahoma / Texas Border - River Borders
Make that at least a baker s dozen by the addition of ALGA. Lowell G. McManus Leesville, Louisiana, USA ... From: acroorca2002 To:
Nov 06, 2003 @ 17:48 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Oklahoma / Texas Border - River Borders
Adam, The compact itself answers your questions thus: __________ 1. Vegetation means trees, shrubs, grasses, and other plant species that substantially
Nov 06, 2003 @ 18:23 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
- Re: Oklahoma / Texas Border - River Borders
alga was already mentioned & meant in the first dozen i dont think there actually are 13 such cases in the usa ... http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Nov 06, 2003 @ 20:46 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
- Re: Oklahoma / Texas Border - River Borders
ahh well now on further reflection i think this was not correct & that we actually have a virgin tripoint position here for since ok now reaches the right bank
Nov 06, 2003 @ 21:24 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
- Re: Oklahoma / Texas Border - River Borders
no no thats all wrong the tripoint hasnt moved & is still wet my blunder ooooops & i was right the first time the extralegal stitch must be of oktx & not arok
Nov 06, 2003 @ 22:00 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
- Re: Oklahoma / Texas Border - River Borders
apologies again & continuing from the latest correction since the stitch must be oktx it could be a prolongation of the deviant arok terminal sector or it
Nov 06, 2003 @ 22:24 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Oklahoma / Texas Border - River Borders
I m glad to see that you ve come around. Otherwise I was about to have to write a long laborious rebuttal. :-) Yes, the extralegal stitch must be sewn with
Nov 06, 2003 @ 23:16 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
- Re: Oklahoma / Texas Border - River Borders
... yes indeed i have just recalled something about this from bus&ss but my copy is out in the truck a few blocks from here i think you are referring to a
Dec 03, 2003 @ 02:08 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)