yes g1 looks as tho it might be the most seaward one
& it is still well within the coastal base lines & internal waters
once past the islands & into the open sea
the boundary line straightens out
& might therefore have no need of buoys
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
<jesniel@i...> wrote:
> Here is a map that indicates Border Buoy G1 and G2.
>
> G1appears to be the from on the book scan.
>
> Jesper
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jesper Nielsen
> To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2003 7:50 AM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Marked maritime boundaries Was:
FRGB
>
>
> Enclosed picture of DEDK buoys from the North Sea.
>
> Taken from the excellent book on DEDK: Told- og
Statsgrænse Danmark/Tyskland 1920-1995 by Aage Emil
Hansen
>
> The text: Sea Markers: The North Sea 1994. The North Sea
maritime border consists of nine straight lines, and a great part
of these are marked by buoys shown on the pictures.
>
> The North Sea border has to follow natural shifting of the
channel, so that free access to Højer Port through Danish
territory is always ensured.
>
> Jesper
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Martin Pratt
> To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 9:34 AM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: FRGB
>
>
> I understand that the Georgia-Turkey territorial sea boundary
is
> marked with buoys and lighting equipment. As far as I'm
aware this
> is the world's only demarcated maritime boundary.
>
> m a r t i n
>
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "acroorca2002"
<orc@o...>
> wrote:
>
> > no maritime boundary markers of any kind anywhere have
ever
> > been reported at bp
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.