Subject: Re: iqsa & kwsa not neutral but condominial<br/>
Date: Apr 06, 2003 @ 03:07<br/>
Author: L. A. Nadybal (&quot;L. A. Nadybal&quot; &lt;lnadybal@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="9594.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="9599.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic9531.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="9597.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="9599.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1824481540">I see that exactly the same way.  I never understood the &quot;neutral&quot;<br/>
business.<br/>
<br/>
Len<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> --- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@o...&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; --- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, Kevin Meynell <br/>
&gt; &lt;kevin@m...&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt;The Saudi-Kuwait neutral zone was established<br/>
&gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; What was the situation with the former Saudi-Iraq neutral zone, <br/>
&gt; which even <br/>
&gt; &gt; had its own country code designator?<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; both of these supposedly neutral zones werent neutral at all <br/>
&gt; but rather condominial<br/>
&gt; since they were jointly exploited <br/>
&gt; rather than mutually vacated or avoided<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; truly neutral zones are basically off limits to both parties & of no <br/>
&gt; use to either or both except as a buffer between them </span></blockquote></div>