Subject: Re: BYLTLV
Date: Apr 01, 2003 @ 03:43
Author: Karolis B. ("Karolis B." <kbajoraz@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> ok then that appears to bust our surmise that the 6x6m framedNo. of course not! the border guards couldn't've told Jan that they
> square of everyones land enclosing all 4 of the mentioned
> elements might be some kind of a legal tridominium
> as contemplated & seriously entertained following jans original
> report in message 3696
>yeah, and de facto sometimes too i guess.
> instead what the square area appears to be is just
> the project
> as worked out per article 3 above
> & any universality inhering in this area appears still to be purely
> sentimental & symbolic
> & tho this little quasi triarea has a practical purpose too inwhich happens. (sarcastic)
> facilitating visitation of the tripoint
> as we have seenposition
> there does not appear to be any actual multidominium here yet
>
>
> also there really is no discernible difference in the byltlv
> depicted in jespers 2 map swatches aboveI would also think the the TP did not change. It was simply searched
> ref message 9496
> but only in the general alignment of the bylt boundary
>
> the 5x difference in scale may be misleading
>
> the tripoint position per se
> does not appear to have ever been displaced
> but only refined & zeroed in upon by the demarcation process