Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] New Group?
Date: Mar 28, 2003 @ 14:12
Author: Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
----- Original Message -----From: Doug MurraySent: Friday, March 28, 2003 2:33 PMSubject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] New Group?
Personally, I'd hate to see the creation of a new site as it will split all of us.
Not only has BP been a great meeting place and source of information -- the
archive is a treasure.
However, if the non-multipointing talk has turned into a real issue we could:
a) vote on the nature of the content on BP and conduct ourselves within
guidelines agreed to by all.
b) follow the moderator's wishes and post as per the charter.
c) form a new group, independent of this one, with more of a border &
geopolitical focus.
Or, we could continue as we had been with what I had thought was
a robust discussion group with (to me) a lot of information a only a
little bit of chaff.
I will go with the group!
Cheers,
Doug
On Friday, March 28, 2003, at 02:09 AM, Kevin Meynell wrote:
Mike,<image.tiff>
>but fortunately there are the other lists & groups devoted to border
>discussion & research
Which ones? I know about the University of Durham list, but I haven't found
any others so far (although maybe I haven't looked hard enough).
Should we consider establishing a group for geopolitical discussion related
to border, boundary and multipoint(ing)?
Regards,
Kevin Meynell
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service .