Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Vermont - Quebec<br/>
Date: Sep 30, 2002 @ 20:52<br/>
Author: Kevin Meynell (Kevin Meynell &lt;kevin@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="7464.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="7485.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic7185.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="7483.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="7485.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-741761126">Jesper,<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;I once read an article on NOSE, and the article ends: Do we need the border?<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Whilst borders are fascinating things (is this not why we&#39;re all on this <br/>
list), I often wonder why we&#39;re so tolerant of border controls on <br/>
international boundaries such as USCA. If border controls existed *within* <br/>
countries, we&#39;d consider that we lived in a police state, yet almost no-one <br/>
seems to question their existence between countries.<br/>
<br/>
Regards,<br/>
<br/>
Kevin Meynell</div>