Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: "Pene-enclave"
Date: Dec 13, 2001 @ 23:52
Author: Brendan Whyte ("Brendan Whyte" <brwhyte@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
>From: "granthutchison" <granthutchison@...>_________________________________________________________________
>Reply-To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
>To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: "Pene-enclave"
>Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 18:03:46 -0000
>
>Michael:
> > there you have the reason grant for my evidently mistaken surmise of
> > your meaning above because i imagined you were talking & playing
> > straight bp too as you usually do
>Not mistaken at all: I was originally looking to use "pene-enclave" as
>a strictly topological designator (an enclave joined to the parent
>entity or another enclave at a single point), and would have used it
>as such if Brendan hadn't fixed my misapprehension. It leaves us, as
>you say, with a need for a name for the topological, strictly BP item
>of which we now have four on land and one at sea at the EEZ level. And
>I do like your coining clavicle, which a bit of Latin etymology would
>link to clavicula, a tendril - and what is a point connection but the
>limiting case of a tendril?
>
> > & i would add tho not to you grant
>Good of you to specifically exclude me, but are you and I not as
>guilty as anyone, after our recent off-message straying into palindromes?
>
>Grant
>