Subject: Re: reflections on the crosses old & new
Date: Dec 13, 2001 @ 07:45
Author: acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> Michael:well it is all in good fun as well as perverse but i do really feel or at least would like to believe & so would maintain that all biquadrijunctions are crosses no matter whether they are strictly cruciform or not
> > well you certainly may do all that & think all that & thus spare
> > yourself the benefit &or deficit of the crosses
> Sorry. I'm not being deliberately, serially perverse, even though it
> may seem that way. I was just wondering if there was a reason you felt
> some borders (Baarle) crossed and some (Jungholz) didn't. The crossing
> thing really does give me an uneasy feeling of the country somehow
> turning inside out at the cross-over point - a sort of gross Klein bottle.
>
> Grant