Subject: Re: World 200nm EEZ survey
Date: Dec 10, 2001 @ 15:51
Author: acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., granthutchison@c... wrote:

> Since I seem to be the champion of the 200nm Exclusive Economic Zone

> territorial limit, I thought I'd revisit Michael's posting 1281, and

> provide what additional detail I can.





> E.E.Z. OCEAN ENCLAVES (with bounding territories)

>

> Arctic:

> 1. Arctic Ocean

> (Russia, Norway, Greenland [Den], Canada, USA)

> 2. Barents Sea

> (Russia, Norway, Svalbard [Nor])

> 3. Norwegian Sea

> (Svalbard [Nor], Norway, Faroes [Den], Iceland, Jan Mayen [Nor],

> Greenland [Den])

>

>

> Gulf of Mexico:

> 1. Gulf of Mexico East

> (USA, Mexico)

> 2. Gulf of Mexico West

> (USA, Cuba, Mexico)

>

> Pacific:

> 1. Bering Sea

> (Russia, USA)

> 2. Sea of Okhotsk

> (Russia)

> 3. Shikoku Basin

> (Japan)

> 4. Philippine Sea

> (Japan, Northern Marianas [USA], Guam [USA], Micronesia, Palau,

> Phillipines)

> 5. Caroline Basin

> (Micronesia, Papua New Guinea, Indonesia, Palau)

> 6. Melanesian Basin

> (Micronesia, Marshalls, Nauru, Kiribati, Tuvalu, Fiji, Solomons,

> Papua New Guinea)

> 7. North Fiji Basin

> (Solomons, Fiji, Vanuatu)

> 8. South Fiji Basin

> (Fiji, Tonga, New Zealand, Norfolk Island [Aus], New Caledonia [Fr])

> 9. Penrhyn Basin

> (Cook Islands [NZ], Kiribati, French Polynesia [Fr])



& i am glad to revisit grants posting 2391 & especially the above snippets from it because even allowing for the possibility that there may be some projecting shelves to unsettle the above arrangements beneath the surface it still seems already possible thanx to the above detail to clearly identify probably 47 everyonese tricounty points situated along the minimum territorial limits



now if only the roster of the everyonese tricountry points situated along the maximum territorial limits could materialize so easily

m