Subject: Re: Really Abitrary Points
Date: Dec 07, 2001 @ 10:50
Author: acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., Anton Sherwood <bronto@p...> wrote:

> acroorca2002 wrote:

> > & when doing cross chronologies of say the christian & roman calendars

> > one must be careful to omit the year zero & pass directly from the year 1

> > bce to the year 1 ce or vice versa

>

> I sometimes wonder why historians use BC rather than Roman years.



evidently for the same reason we dont normally switch for no reason from fahrenheit when above freezing to centigrade when below or vice versa

to continue with the also mismatched original thermometer example



> If Tolkien characters can cope with having year 1 follow year 3021,

> we ought to be able to handle 1 following 753.



well did you know this morning already begins bp year 1 & a half aka our first multiantipodes day or sesquianniversary & we have scarcely yesterday invented split 4 & a half & 3 & a half points so we ought to be able to handle it but clearly this kind of stuff isnt for everybody

m